What is ecovadis readiness?
The vendor-onboarding assessment approached like a filing: evidence collected against the methodology before the deadline, not after the score.
An EcoVadis assessment usually starts with an email from a customer, not a compliance deadline. A large buyer — a retailer, an OEM, a pharma or tech enterprise running a supplier sustainability program — sends a sharing request through the EcoVadis platform, and the invited supplier has a window, often 30 to 45 days, to complete a questionnaire before the request lapses. There's no statute requiring this and no regulator involved. The requirement lives entirely in the customer's own procurement policy, which increasingly sets a minimum EcoVadis score or medal as a condition of staying on the approved-vendor list or qualifying for new business. That makes an EcoVadis scorecard a commercial credential, not a legal one — the stakes are a contract, not a penalty.
The questionnaire itself is scaled to the company: EcoVadis assigns a subset of roughly 21 sustainability criteria across four themes based on company size, sector and country risk profile, and every criterion is scored on a Policies-Actions-Results structure. Policies means a written, dated, signed-off commitment — an environmental policy, a supplier code of conduct, a whistleblower policy — not a company value stated on a website. Actions means the certifications, training records, audit reports and deployment evidence that show the policy is actually operating, weighted the heaviest of the three pillars. Results means the metrics, the sustainability report if one exists, and EcoVadis's own '360° Watch' — an automated scan of news, NGO reports and other public sources that can move a score up or down independent of anything the company submits. A supplier can write a strong policy document and still score poorly if the evidence for Actions and Results isn't there to back it up.
Who does what
| Your CapEasy team | EcoVadis readiness, the reconciliations and reporting behind it, and the questions list that keeps it honest. |
| Your CPA or enrolled agent | Everything that carries a licence in United States — rendered exactly as written: issue compilation, review or audit reports — those are restricted to licensed cpa firms. |
| You | One conversation with one named person, and the decisions that are genuinely yours. |
EcoVadis readiness in United States
The 30-point theme floor decides medal eligibility before the blended score does
EcoVadis requires a minimum of 30 out of 100 in each of the four themes — Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics, Sustainable Procurement — before a company is even eligible for a medal, independent of its overall percentile. A company can post a strong blended score built on one or two strong themes and still miss every medal tier because Ethics or Sustainable Procurement, usually the thinnest documentation for a small or mid-size company, sat under the floor. We map the theme-by-theme gap before a first submission, not after the scorecard comes back.
Medal cutoffs are percentiles, recalculated against that year's pool — not fixed scores
The published bands are Platinum (top 1%), Gold (top 5%), Silver (top 15%) and Bronze (top 35%) of all companies assessed in the trailing period, with a separate Committed badge at a flat minimum score around 45 for companies below medal range. Because the pool of assessed suppliers keeps improving its own documentation year over year, the raw score needed to clear a given medal has been drifting upward — reporting has put the Bronze cut near 64 and Silver near 72 in 2026, up from a year earlier. A number that cleared Silver on a past scorecard is not a number we can promise will clear it on the next one.
Policies, Actions and Results are scored as three separate pillars, weighted unevenly
Each of the roughly 21 scored criteria is assessed across Policies (documented, dated commitments — weighted lightest), Actions (certifications, training, deployment evidence, audit records — weighted heaviest), and Results (metrics, public reporting, and the 360° Watch scan of external sources — weighted second-heaviest). A written policy with no evidence it changed anything scores low on Actions no matter how well the policy document itself reads. We build the evidence file to the pillar that's actually thin, which is usually Actions or Results, not the policy documents companies already have.
A scorecard is valid 12 months, and every reassessment restarts against that cycle's methodology
A published EcoVadis scorecard can be shared with any buyer who requests it for 12 months from publication — one assessment answers every customer asking that year. The next sharing request after 12 months triggers a full reassessment, built fresh against whatever criteria weightings and medal thresholds EcoVadis is running that cycle, since both shift periodically. We track the 12-month clock against every customer relationship it's shared with, so a reassessment starts before a scorecard lapses mid-negotiation, not after.
What your CPA or enrolled agent receives from us
- A criteria-by-criteria evidence map: every EcoVadis criterion assigned to this company's size/sector/country risk profile, matched to the policy, action or result document that answers it — or flagged as missing.
- A theme-floor gap analysis showing where Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics and Sustainable Procurement each stand against the 30-point medal-eligibility minimum, before submission.
- Draft responses to the assessed questionnaire, referenced to the underlying document for each answer, ready for the platform administrator to review line by line before submitting.
- The document set itself, organized by criterion and pillar: policies with sign-off dates, certifications, training completion records, supplier code of conduct acknowledgments, audit reports.
- A 360° Watch pre-check — a review of public news, NGO reports and other external sources likely to surface in EcoVadis's own scan, flagged ahead of submission rather than found in the scorecard's findings.
- A corrective action plan template for any criterion scoring below target, with the specific document or process gap named and an owner assigned inside the company.


