United StatesServices For accounting firmsAudit support schedules

For accounting firms

Audit support schedules for US businesses

The supporting schedules an audit asks for, prepared from finished books.

Why founders pick CapEasy

5.0★ across 335+ Google reviews

2,700+ businesses served across the group

What is audit support schedules?

The supporting schedules an audit asks for, prepared from finished books.

An audit under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards runs on an engagement letter between your firm and your client, a PBC ("prepared by client") list issued at planning, and a fieldwork window where staff test what the client produced against what the ledger says. The PBC list is where most engagements lose time — it arrives as a folder of bank statements, GL exports, and loose documents, and someone still has to turn that into lead schedules a senior can actually open and tie to the trial balance. That conversion is our work: raw PBC items become indexed, tied-out schedules before your staff sit down with the file.

Calendar-year private companies cluster fieldwork into the same January–April window your firm is also running individual and corporate tax season, which is exactly why audit prep backs up. Nonprofits and governmental entities on a June 30 fiscal year push a second wave into the fall, often under Uniform Guidance single-audit requirements if they carry federal awards, or Government Auditing Standards (the Yellow Book) if a state or local grant agreement calls for it. Either calendar produces the same bottleneck: PBC items land, and a schedule has to exist before a tester can start.

Who does what

Your CapEasy teamAudit support schedules, the reconciliations and reporting behind it, and the questions list that keeps it honest.
Your CPA or enrolled agentEverything that carries a licence in United States — rendered exactly as written: issue compilation, review or audit reports — those are restricted to licensed cpa firms.
YouOne conversation with one named person, and the decisions that are genuinely yours.

Audit support schedules in United States

Who the opinion belongs to

GAAS — the AU-C sections issued through the AICPA's Auditing Standards Board, or PCAOB standards for issuers — governs how the audit is performed, and the opinion is signed by a licensed CPA holding the engagement, on your firm's letterhead, under your firm's peer review coverage. We work inside the file your engagement team controls; the opinion, the risk assessment behind it, and the signature are never something we touch.

What a PBC list actually is, and why late items cost time

The PBC list is issued at planning and is due before fieldwork starts — it's the client's obligation, not the auditor's, and a late or partial PBC delivery is the single most common cause of a fieldwork window slipping. We track PBC items against the list as they arrive, flag what's missing while there's still runway to chase it, and turn each item into a schedule the moment it's usable instead of waiting for the folder to be complete.

External confirmations under AU-C 505

Bank, AR, and legal confirmations have to go directly to a third party and come back directly to the auditor — that's the standard's whole point, and it's why a confirmation can't be prepared by the client itself. We prepare the request against the population your team specifies, send it, and track responses against the follow-up schedule; a non-response past the second follow-up gets flagged to your team, who decide on alternative procedures.

Audit sampling under AU-C 530

Sample size and method — statistical or nonstatistical, and the tolerable misstatement behind it — is an engagement-team judgment call under AU-C 530, made in your firm's audit software. Once that selection exists, retrieving the actual population items behind each sampled number is mechanical, and that's the part we do: a tester opens the file and finds the invoice, not a placeholder.

What your CPA or enrolled agent receives from us

  • Lead schedules for each trial balance line, tied to supporting detail and cross-referenced to your firm's indexing convention
  • Bank, AR, and legal confirmation requests prepared against the specified population, sent, and tracked through follow-up rounds
  • Sample-selection items retrieved and organized — invoices, purchase orders, shipping documents — matched to the sample list your engagement software generated
  • PBC list items logged against the original request, with a running status of received, incomplete, and outstanding
  • Fixed asset, debt, and equity rollforwards reconciled to the general ledger and prior-year workpapers
  • Cutoff-testing support: transactions and supporting documents pulled for the period surrounding year-end

Questions worth asking before you start

Who actually does the work — a person or an AI tool?

A named person on our team owns your file and reviews everything that leaves it. Software does a real share of the grinding underneath it — coding, matching, flagging the obvious gaps — but nothing regulated happens without a person’s judgement, and nothing here is signed or filed by an algorithm.

Is there a filing or lodging step here?

No — audit support schedules is operational work inside your books, not something submitted to IRS. Where a filing does sit downstream of it, inside for accounting firms more broadly, that stays with your CPA or enrolled agent, never with us.

Which software do you work in?

Whatever you already run. Most commonly QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Zoho Books and a handful of others — we work inside your system rather than moving you onto one of our own.

How does this actually start?

A short, free read-only look at what you already have, and a written note on what we found. A scoping call decides the size of the engagement — nothing here commits you to anything.

What does it cost?

There is no published price for audit support schedules — it depends on volume, how many entities are involved, and how far behind the books are. We quote after the read-only review, which is free.

How does this fit with the rest of for accounting firms?

Audit support schedules sits inside for accounting firms, alongside White-label bookkeeping, Workpaper preparation, Return preparation support. Most clients end up buying the category as a whole rather than one leaf at a time, but starting narrow is fine.

Do we ever have direct contact with your client, or does everything go through us?

We work from the PBC items and population data your engagement team provides — we don't initiate contact with your client independently. The client relationship, the engagement letter, and every communication with the client stay entirely with your firm.

How is client confidentiality handled when you're preparing schedules from our engagement?

Client data is used only for the schedules and confirmations your engagement team specifies, under the confidentiality terms of our arrangement with your firm — never shared, retained beyond the engagement, or repurposed for another client. We can work through whatever NDA or confidentiality addendum your firm requires before any client data changes hands.

Does using outsourced schedule preparation create an independence problem under the AICPA Code of Conduct?

That determination is your firm's to make, not ours — we don't perform audit procedures, form conclusions, or become part of the engagement team, which is the distinction that matters for a self-review threat analysis. We prepare schedules and organize evidence; your engagement team retains every judgment call the standards require to stay with the auditor.

If a confirmation never comes back, do you decide what to do next?

No — we track the outstanding confirmation and send follow-up rounds on the schedule your team sets, but the decision to pursue an alternative procedure, escalate, or accept the risk is your engagement team's call under AU-C 505, not ours.

Do you touch materiality, sample size, or risk assessment at any point?

No. Those are set by your engagement team in your audit software before we ever see the file. We work downstream of that judgment — pulling the sample items, building the schedules — never upstream of it.

Does this cover single audits under Uniform Guidance, or just a standard financial statement audit?

The schedule-and-confirmation work is the same underlying task whether the engagement is a standard GAAS audit or a Uniform Guidance single audit — we build to whatever schedule set and PBC list your engagement team specifies, including federal-award schedules if that's part of the file.

Who signs off on the schedules you prepare — do they carry any authority on their own?

None. Every schedule we hand back is a working document for your team to test, review, and sign off on inside your own file. It carries no standing until your engagement team has reviewed it.

How do professional-indemnity considerations work when a third party touches part of the audit file?

The engagement, the opinion, and the liability behind it stay entirely with your firm — we're a preparer of underlying schedules, not a party to the engagement or the opinion. Most firms handle this the same way they'd handle any outsourced-services arrangement: a written scope, a confidentiality term, and our work product treated as your firm's workpaper once it's in the file.

Can you handle multiple client engagements from the same firm during the same busy season?

Yes — that's the actual point of the service during a January–April or fall crunch, when your own staff are stretched across tax season and multiple audit files at once. Each engagement is scoped and tracked separately, so client data and schedules never cross between files.

What happens to the schedules and confirmation tracker once the engagement is complete?

They're handed over as part of your workpaper file and retained only per whatever retention or destruction terms your firm specifies in the engagement scope — we don't keep an independent copy for our own use afterward.

Your CapEasy experts

Connect with us

Talk to the people who handle this work every day — no call centre, no hand-offs.

Ayush Joshi

Ayush Joshi

Co-Founder

Ex-OYO and Tenaciousfly. 7+ years in business development, strategic acquisitions, financing and debt syndication.

Aditya Jain

Aditya Jain

Co-Founder

Ex-Bank of America. 4+ years in investment banking, EU & Indian compliances, ESG compliances, and project management.

Manav Raval

Virtual CFO & Tax Specialist

Section 80-IAC, tax planning and startup compliance. Previously at Toyota Motor Corporation and Jaguar Land Rover.

Ayush Faldu

Virtual CFO & Tax Specialist

Financial strategy, budgeting and cash flow — a CFO’s judgement, monthly.

Start with a look at the actual file.

Read-only access and a written note on what we found. Free, and the fastest way to know whether we are useful to you.

Book a 20-minute fit callAll of for accounting firms