Nonprofits for Australian businesses

A named person on our team owns your file and reviews everything that leaves it. Software does a real share of the grinding underneath it — coding, matching, flagging the obvious gaps — but nothing regulated happens without a person’s judgement, and nothing here is signed or filed by an algorithm.

No — nonprofits is operational work inside your books, not something submitted to ATO. Where a filing does sit downstream of it, inside industries we know more broadly, that stays with your registered BAS or tax agent, never with us.

Whatever you already run. Most commonly QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Zoho Books and a handful of others — we work inside your system rather than moving you onto one of our own.

A short, free read-only look at what you already have, and a written note on what we found. A scoping call decides the size of the engagement — nothing here commits you to anything.

There is no published price for nonprofits — it depends on volume, how many entities are involved, and how far behind the books are. We quote after the read-only review, which is free.

Nonprofits sits inside industries we know, alongside Ecommerce, SaaS and software, Professional services. Most clients end up buying the category as a whole rather than one leaf at a time, but starting narrow is fine.

No. We track revenue against the tier thresholds and flag when a boundary is approaching, and we assemble the support schedules the AIS needs, but the lodgement itself — and the tier determination behind it — is the accountant's or registered agent's responsibility.

That's a judgment call under AASB 1058/1015 that stays with the charity's accountant. We code the transaction and flag the agreement's obligation structure so the accountant has the information to make that call — we don't make the recognition determination ourselves.

We can flag when a transaction pattern looks like it may qualify for a concession, but ascertaining or advising on a tax position — including which GST concessions or FBT rebates apply — is a registered tax or BAS agent's role under TASA, not ours.

The reconciliation mechanics are similar, but a charity's books carry a structure a regular business doesn't need: restricted and unrestricted funds tracked separately, income recognition tested against each grant's obligation terms, and every funding agreement tracked to its own acquittal calendar. That structure is what makes an acquittal or an AIS support schedule possible without rebuilding the year from scratch.

Yes — each funding agreement, whether state or Commonwealth, is coded to its own budget lines from intake, so an acquittal is a matter of formatting coded data to that funder's template rather than re-deriving the numbers under deadline pressure.

We track cumulative revenue against the $500,000 and $3 million thresholds through the year, so the committee sees a likely tier change coming and can engage a reviewer or auditor with enough runway, rather than discovering the requirement at lodgement time.

Yes — we maintain that fund separation in the ledger on an ongoing basis. Whether a specific activity or gift actually qualifies for DGR treatment is a determination for the charity's accountant.

Yes — a standing pack covering program-level P&L, budget-to-actual variance, and the restricted-versus-available funds position, built off the same coded ledger every other output draws from.

A named member of our team owns the ledger and every reconciliation in it — AI speeds up repetitive coding and matching, but a person reviews the output, and your accountant or registered agent still reviews and lodges. Nothing is recorded or reported without that human accountability chain.

We track revenue and expenditure by program or location in the ledger so state-specific reporting can be pulled independently, but state fundraising licensing and registration requirements themselves are a compliance matter for the charity's accountant or legal adviser, not something we determine.